@line รับ เครดิต ฟรี2019 RightNation.US
News (Home) | Righters' Blog | Hollywood Halfwits | Our Store | New User Intro | Link to us | Support Us

สล็อตเงินสด_sbobet ไหนดีสุด_r พา เล่น บา คา ร่า_อันดับเกมส์สล็อต_สูตรบาคาร่าอาจารย์คิม

@line รับ เครดิต ฟรี2019Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Did Chief Justice Roberts Just Urinate On My Leg? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Liz 

  • ***-----------***
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 49,947
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 03:50 PM

Did Chief Justice Roberts Just Urinate On My Leg?

American Thinker
By John Dietrich
November 23, 2018

Excerpt:

Chief Justice John Roberts recently wrote, "We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges."

The chief justice knows that this is not true, and I find it extremely insulting that he believes that I am stupid enough to believe it. As he relieved himself on my leg, he told me it was raining. Roberts's statement was a response to President Trump's criticism of "Obama judges" who ruled against the administration.

The president replied, "Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have 'Obama judges,' and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country. It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an 'independent judiciary'[.]"

Dov Fischer at the American Spectator claimed, "[I]t sounds ridiculous ?even borderline delusional ?to deny that today's federal judiciary is chock-full of Obama judges and Clinton judges on a mission to stop President Trump's agenda."

Justice Roberts is not delusional.

Justices do not have the name of the president who nominated them in their titles. In this respect only, Justice Roberts is correct. However, they generally reflect the philosophy of the president who nominated them. Robert Barnes of the Washington Post remarked, "[S]tudies show there are clear ideological differences between judges nominated by presidents of different parties." Do we actually need studies to illustrate this?

Yet the pool of potential judicial nominees is dominated by progressives, and even "conservative" nominees can turn out to be quite liberal. U.S. district judge Timothy Kelly ?a Trump appointee ?ruled against the administration in its attempt to revoke CNN reporter Jim Acosta's White House press credentials.

Judges are human beings. They reflect a wide range of personality types and philosophies. There are "wise Latinas," "wise Yentas," and even "wise old Crackers." Their core responsibility is to make decisions free of bias using the U.S. Constitution as a guideline. This is not always the case. Justice Thurgood Marshall is famous for saying, "You guys have been practicing discrimination for years. Now it's our turn."

Like any statement by the president, this one will be attacked by his opponents in government and the media. Sen. Richard Blumenthal tweeted, "Thanks Chief Justice Roberts for your powerful rebuke to Trump ?refuting his demagogic denunciation of an 'Obama judge.'" Blumenthal claimed, "When the history of this dark era is written, our independent judiciary (& free press) will be the heroes. Our gratitude goes to them this Thanksgiving."

One of the most troubling aspects of the Judiciary's failings is what appears to be its sympathy for the criminal.

*snip*

Full Commentary
0

#2 User is offline   Currahee! 

  • <no title>
  • Group: 100+ Posts NonDonor
  • Posts: 2,102
  • Joined: 21-April 04

Posted 23 November 2018 - 04:02 PM

"Dark Era"?? I think Sen. Blumenthal is the one with the delusions...remember he deluded himself into a combat role in VietNam....
0

#3 User is online   SARGE 

  • <no title>
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 10,532
  • Joined: 26-June 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 04:03 PM

If Roberts (I'll omit the honorific 'Justice') thinks that upon being appointed or elected as a judge somehow transforms a mortal human into an omniscient impartial demiurge of justice, he is indeed a naďve fool.
0

#4 User is offline   spt 

  • <no title>
  • View gallery
  • Group: Bronze
  • Posts: 3,804
  • Joined: 07-October 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 05:42 PM

I want to know what all Obama, Clinton and the other liberals have on Roberts that they are holding over him to spout the nonsense he has been spouting these past few years. Or has he decided to throw all thinking out the window and go with the liberal thinking ideology.

This post has been edited by spt: 23 November 2018 - 05:42 PM

0

#5 User is online   Dean Adam Smithee 

  • School of the Cold Hard Facts
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 19,479
  • Joined: 11-December 04

Posted 23 November 2018 - 05:59 PM

View PostLiz, on 23 November 2018 - 03:50 PM, said:

Did Chief Justice Roberts Just Urinate On My Leg?


No, he didn't. See my other post as to why not. He said what he had to say. No, harm no foul. But, of course, each side will hear what they want to hear, with much bloviating and /or column-inches written about it. Because that's what pays for yacht-club memberships.
0

#6 User is online   Junto 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 613
  • Joined: 19-January 06

Posted 23 November 2018 - 06:46 PM

View Postspt, on 23 November 2018 - 05:42 PM, said:

I want to know what all Obama, Clinton and the other liberals have on Roberts that they are holding over him to spout the nonsense he has been spouting these past few years. Or has he decided to throw all thinking out the window and go with the liberal thinking ideology.

Maybe he doesn't want to be found dead with a pillow over his face, followed by no autopsy.


*Edited because phone/spellcheck.

This post has been edited by Junto: 23 November 2018 - 07:15 PM

0

#7 User is offline   Ticked@TinselTown 

  • Unimpressed with Celebutards since Always
  • View blog
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 27,282
  • Joined: 01-April 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 07:33 PM

View Postspt, on 23 November 2018 - 05:42 PM, said:

I want to know what all Obama, Clinton and the other liberals have on Roberts that they are holding over him to spout the nonsense he has been spouting these past few years. Or has he decided to throw all thinking out the window and go with the liberal thinking ideology.


Well, Axelrod can find skeletons anywhere and wasn't there some sort of kurfluffle about the legitimacy of Roberts' adoption of Irish children...?
0

#8 User is offline   USNJIMRET 

  • Rule 1:The Chief is right Rule 2:If in doubt, check Rule 1
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Platinum Community Supporter
  • Posts: 20,088
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 08:42 PM

View PostDean Adam Smithee, on 23 November 2018 - 05:59 PM, said:

No, he didn't. See my other post as to why not. He said what he had to say. No, harm no foul. But, of course, each side will hear what they want to hear, with much bloviating and /or column-inches written about it. Because that's what pays for yacht-club memberships.



Sheesh...I don't recall Roberts coming out and publicly admonishing Nobama when he very publicly insulted the entire court.
But I guess that's different? :scratch:
Roberts has either had a change of mind/heart, is being coerced or a little of both.
Either way, more than a few actions by him that seemed unlikely earlier in his tenure.
0

#9 User is offline   grimreefer 

  • U.S. Merchant Marine
  • View gallery
  • Group: Diamond Community Supporter
  • Posts: 4,316
  • Joined: 18-December 03

Posted 23 November 2018 - 11:41 PM

View PostCurrahee!, on 23 November 2018 - 04:02 PM, said:

"Dark Era"?? I think Sen. Blumenthal is the one with the delusions...remember he deluded himself into a combat role in VietNam....

He's lucky he wasn't. America... not so much since we're stuck with the constant braying of that jackass. He's the epitome of the type of 'self serving at anyone else's cost' candidate for a fragging.
0

#10 User is online   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 25,417
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 23 November 2018 - 11:43 PM

 Dean Adam Smithee, on 23 November 2018 - 05:59 PM, said:

No, he didn't. See my other post as to why not. He said what he had to say. No, harm no foul. But, of course, each side will hear what they want to hear, with much bloviating and /or column-inches written about it. Because that's what pays for yacht-club memberships.

I couldn’t disagree more if I tried.
0

#11 User is online   zurg 

  • <no title>
  • Group: +Copper Community Supporter
  • Posts: 25,417
  • Joined: 19-October 09

Posted 24 November 2018 - 08:03 PM

Schemer inadvertently agrees with Trump: https://www.foxnews....litical-rulings
0

#12 User is offline   MontyPython 

  • Pull My Finger.....
  • View gallery
  • Group: Gold
  • Posts: 53,331
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 24 November 2018 - 08:09 PM

View Postzurg, on 24 November 2018 - 08:03 PM, said:

Schemer inadvertently agrees with Trump: https://www.foxnews....litical-rulings


From your link:

Schumer piled on, criticizing President Trump in a Friday tweet: “I don’t agree very often with Chief Justice Roberts, especially his partisan decisions which seem highly political ? But I am thankful today that he ?almost alone among Republicans ?stood up to President Trump and for an independent judiciary.?br />
OK, stop and think about that tweet. If Schumer calls Roberts a Republican and believes the chief justice issues “partisan decisions which seem highly political?he is corroborating President Trump. The New York Democratic senator sank one for the president.


Hey whaddaya know! Schumer finally got one right!!

:woohoo:
0

#13 User is offline   Censport 

  • @CensportRacing
  • Group: +Bronze Community Supporter
  • Posts: 15,656
  • Joined: 13-August 03

Posted 25 November 2018 - 01:23 AM

If a judge appointed by Obama...

bundled $200,000 for Obama's campaign...

donated of his own money to groups supporting Obama...

blocked the release of undercover videos on Planned Parenthood...

and blocked Trump's sanctuary city order...

that @$$hole is an "Obama judge".

0

#14 User is offline   Liz 

  • ***-----------***
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 49,947
  • Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 25 November 2018 - 02:55 PM

View PostCensport, on 25 November 2018 - 01:23 AM, said:

If a judge appointed by Obama...

bundled $200,000 for Obama's campaign...

donated of his own money to groups supporting Obama...

blocked the release of undercover videos on Planned Parenthood...

and blocked Trump's sanctuary city order...

that @$$hole is an "Obama judge".


Let's see Justice Roberts argue with that.

:clap: :clap: :clap:
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users